Get access to our best features
Get access to our best features
Published 2 months ago

Controlled experiment finds no detectable citation bump from Twitter promotion

Summary by Ground News
The authors of this study are leading science communicators on Twitter from several life science disciplines. They conducted a three-year-long controlled experiment, randomly selecting five articles published in the same month and journal, and randomly tweeting one while retaining the others as controls. Randomization tests revealed that tweeted articles were downloaded 2.6%-3.9 times more often than controls immediately after tweeting, and retained significantly higher Altmetric scores (+81%) and number of tweets (+105%) three years after tweeting. However, while some tweeted papers were cited more than their respective control papers, the overall increase in citation counts after three years was not statistically significant.

0 Articles

All
Left
Center
Right
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe
Ground News Article Assistant
Not enough coverage to generate an Article Assistant.

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Sources are mostly out of (0)