US Supreme Court leans toward Jan. 6 rioter in obstruction case, with Trump implications
- Justices expressed concern about the broad interpretation of a law focusing on evidence destruction and its potential consequences.
- Questions arose regarding scenarios like sit-ins, heckling, and pulling fire alarms that could result in federal charges and implications for Trump's case.
- Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson referenced Enron while challenging the law's application in real-world contexts and hinted at a possible middle ground with Justice Amy Coney Barrett for Jan. 6 defendants.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
0 Articles
0 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Coverage Details
Total News Sources0
Leaning Left20Leaning Right8Center12Last Updated23 days agoBias Distribution50% Left